This is a discussion on Newest Install of Apache doesn't run-- Port 80 blocked within the Windows Web Servers forums, part of the Web Server and Related Forums category; I have the same problem as below, and did shutdown zonealarm, along with the antivirus per Willam Rowe. My question ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I have the same problem as below, and did shutdown zonealarm, along
with the antivirus per Willam Rowe. My question is, if you think zone alarm is such crap (and it might as well be for all I know-- I don't know for sure), what do you use then if you want to keep the myriad of DOS attacks, continual attacks of NetSky@a-q, that come in the form of Re: Approved, using an "unprotected" computer to launch attacks If you're trying to run Apache, and have it work along with *a firewall* and *an antivirus "package"*, what it is that you suggest that be used? and can some of these be set up to "listen" on another port other than 80? D William A. Rowe wrote... Uninstall your damn firewall software. And the antivirus crap too. One of them is playing on the socket stack, and causing you these problems. It wouldn't happen to be ZoneAlarm? Guessed so. They really write some crappy drivers. Bill Joseph Gruber wrote: > I am having a problem with Apache that I can't seem to figure out. My > box has Windows XP Pro on it & does not have any other servers on it > (eg: IIS). Nothing else besides Apache is set to use port 80. About > every 12-24 hours Apache will all of a sudden just stop working. I > proceed to stop the service and then when I start the service I get > the following msg: > > "apache: Could not determine the server's fully qualified domain name, > using 192.168.0.1 for ServerName > (730048)Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network > address/port) is normally permitted. : make_sock: could not bind to > address 65.35.178.52:80 > no listening sockets available, shutting down > Unable to open logs" > |
|
|||
|
Dobsons wrote: > if you think zone alarm is such crap (and it might as > well be for all I know-- I don't know for sure), what do you use then > if you want to keep the myriad of DOS attacks, continual attacks of > NetSky@a-q, that come in the form of Re: Approved, using an > "unprotected" computer to launch attacks > > If you're trying to run Apache, and have it work along with *a > firewall* and *an antivirus "package"*, what it is that you suggest > that be used? and can some of these be set up to "listen" on another > port other than 80? Please don't top-post. It's about as easy to read as English written sdrawkcab (backwards). Zone Alarm is generally considered to be crap. I haven't used it myself, but just look at the GUI - the first time I saw it I thought is was some kind of parody or joke. The user interface to a software firewall should make it easy for users to obtain accurate information and configure the application correctly. Zone Alarm, OTOH, looks more like an arcade game. On Windows XP, I use just the built-in software firewall. Virus scanners usually don't interfere with server applications. Obscure "security suite" packages are an entirely different thing. I have run Apache together with McAfee antivirus software, but I'm sure most other virus scanners will work as well. Thor -- http://www.anta.net/ |