Apache server on Windows

I installed apache 2.0..48 with Php 4.3.4
Local works great, but when other people want to see my website via my
public ip adres they see halve of mine website.
Some images you can see other not.

What do i wrong?

http://loupa.dyndns.ws/

tnx

Louwrens Parre wrote:

> Some images you can see other not.
>
> What do i wrong?
>
> http://loupa.dyndns.ws/

You try to use frames (which is bad), and your frameset is broken (which is
worse). Please fix the problems outlined at
<URL:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Floupa.dyndns.ws%2F&charset= %28detect+automatically%29&doctype=HTML+4.01+Frame set>.

Thor

--
http://thorweb.anta.net/

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:16:55 +0200, Thor Kottelin <thor@anta.net>
wrote:

>
>
>Louwrens Parre wrote:
>
>> Some images you can see other not.
>>
>> What do i wrong?
>>
>> http://loupa.dyndns.ws/
>
>You try to use frames (which is bad), and your frameset is broken (which is
>worse). Please fix the problems outlined at
><URL:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Floupa.dyndns.ws%2F&charset= %28detect+automatically%29&doctype=HTML+4.01+Frame set>.
>
>Thor


This is the right site http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~lparre/
About 5 years ago they said frames is bad. But with browser which we
use now is no problem.
I think you live in the wrong time, do you see much websites without
frames?
your site simple, just a few words with some simple html-tags. Thats
the reason why you come through the validator.

you still use Netscape 1.1 ? ;-)

And you did not answer my question!

Louwrens Parre wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:16:55 +0200, Thor Kottelin <thor@anta.net>
> wrote:

> >Louwrens Parre wrote:
> >
> >> Some images you can see other not.
> >>
> >> What do i wrong?
> >>
> >> http://loupa.dyndns.ws/
> >
> >You try to use frames (which is bad), and your frameset is broken (which is
> >worse). Please fix the problems outlined at
> ><URL:http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Floupa.dyndns.ws%2F&charset= %28detect+automatically%29&doctype=HTML+4.01+Frame set>.

> This is the right site http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~lparre/
> About 5 years ago they said frames is bad. But with browser which we
> use now is no problem.
> I think you live in the wrong time, do you see much websites without
> frames?

Yes. I just checked my top ten referrers - none of them use frames. Not a
lot of frame-based sites rank high on Google.

Why do you think sites such as Google, Yahoo, AOL, Netscape, MSN and
AltaVista don't use frames?

> your site simple, just a few words with some simple html-tags. Thats
> the reason why you come through the validator.
>
> you still use Netscape 1.1 ? ;-)

No, and that's not the point, since I don't usually make web sites just for
myself.

> And you did not answer my question!

You asked why <URL:http://loupa.dyndns.ws/> didn't work. I told you it
didn't work because the frameset was broken.
<URL:http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~lparre/> works for me. Besides, this is not a
help desk.

Thor

--
http://thorweb.anta.net/

Louwrens Parre wrote:

> your site simple, just a few words with some simple html-tags. Thats
> the reason why you come through the validator.

No, it's not. The site passes validation because it's valid.

Thor

--
http://thorweb.anta.net/