This is a discussion on Re: [stunnel-users] Linux FIPS compile libary question within the Stunnel Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; --===============0637523079== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E13BgyNx05feLLmH" Content-Disposition: ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
--===============0637523079== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E13BgyNx05feLLmH" Content-Disposition: inline --E13BgyNx05feLLmH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:44:39PM -0400, Joe Kemp wrote: > I am compiling stunnel on Centos 5 that has a regular Openssl 0.9.8b rpm = installed. I have put my FIPS openssl in /usr/local/sslfips112. > FIPSLD_CC=3Dgcc /usr/local/sslfips112/bin/fipsld -g -O2 -Wall -Wshadow > -Wcast-align -Wpointer-arith -I/usr/local/sslfips112/include -o > stunnel file.o client.o log.o options.o protocol.o network.o > resolver.o ssl.o ctx.o verify.o sthreads.o stunnel.o auth.o pty.o > libwrap.o -lldap -lz -ldl -lutil -lnsl -lpthread > -L/usr/local/sslfips112/lib -lssl -lcrypto =20 > This builds a stunnel that seems to run fine. During startup it > says "stunnel is in FIPS mode." But if I run "ldd stunnel" it shows > it needs /lib/libssl.so.6. While stunnel is running lsof shows it > has that library open also. Why does my FIPS stunnel build still > use the 0.9.8b shared library? Shouldn't all of the ssl > dependencies been handled by the static FIPS openssl library during > linking? The same issue exists for libcrypt. I've never tried to compile a FIPS binary, so this might all be wrong. Grains of salt recommended. The basic issue is that -lssl doesn't just mean "use libssl.so to resolve symbols while linking". It *also* means "store libssl.so in the table of needed libraries in the final executable". Mostly because the linker has no way of knowing _a priori_ if the executable will eventually try to access some symbol from the library that was not evident during the link (think dlopen) Adding -Wl,--as-needed to the linker line *ought* to solve this, by telling the linker to only add entries to the needed table for dynamic libraries whose symbols are explicitely required during the link. Beware that libtool likes to reorder args to the linker, and it seems to like putting this option at the end, where it becomes useles. There's a patch at http://bugs.debian.org/347650 that might help with that, but it's not quite for the faint-hearted. Good luck. --E13BgyNx05feLLmH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH/k1cAZmDGK3JvCgRAv2+AJ4rfgjDFxZhBJMM8CZ95IJzmHZILgC fZ3wb wPdtJMdheImGE2P9TnrpZx4= =09vj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E13BgyNx05feLLmH-- --===============0637523079== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users@mirt.net http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users --===============0637523079==-- |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|