This is a discussion on Re: [stunnel-users] Enhancement request - Increase thread stack size within the Stunnel Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Mccue, Richard Alan wrote: > I load an engine into Stunnel to access the private key. The engine loads > ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Mccue, Richard Alan wrote: > I load an engine into Stunnel to access the private key. The engine loads > without incident, but Stunnel consistently aborts when creating a session > with the first peer because the thread stack is too small. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to sacrifice stunnel scalability for compatibility with this engine. Thread stack size is one of the main limitations for the number of concurrent threads on 32-bit platforms. IMHO it's better to fix the engine code to allocate its buffers on the heap. What do you think? Best regards, Mike _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users@mirt.net http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|