Re: [stunnel-users] Moving binaries to /usr/bin

This is a discussion on Re: [stunnel-users] Moving binaries to /usr/bin within the Stunnel Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; --===============1611641296== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > Stunnel Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2007
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [stunnel-users] Moving binaries to /usr/bin


--===============1611641296==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX"
Content-Disposition: inline


--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 06:18:29PM +0200, Michal Trojnara wrote:
> On Saturday 22 September 2007 07:50, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > The Debian package of stunnel changed the default location of the
> > > binaries, from /usr/sbin to /usr/bin. This is because we consider that
> > > stunnel is not an admin only tool, but is useful to regular users (as
> > > it does not require root privileges for several common use cases).

> >
> > I did the same in Cygwin (or maybe the previous packager did; anyway Cy=

gwin
> > puts the main executable in /usr/bin), for the same reason.

>=20
> My comment to all port maintainers, if my opinion as the mainstream autho=

r is=20
> somehow relevant:


Indeed it is :)

> I don't recommend implementing any changes that break mainstream=20
> compatibility.


I agree with the idea. Unfortunately, I'm now sort of forced to do
this because

a) If I don't, I'll be breaking the LSB, and thus, Debian policy. =20

b) The change is already done (indeed, it was done by the previous
maintainer quite a while ago). Changing it back now will just bring
pointles breakage to users.

Actually, the point of my mail was to see if I could stop carrying
this divergence, by having the change incorporated here, upstream. I
read your answer as saying 'no', and that's fine by me. The change has
not been a support burden so far, so I will keep it. That's I think,
the correct compromise, as it's Debian's (and not mainstream's)
requirements I'm serving with it.

--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG9Wc+AZmDGK3JvCgRAlTRAJ9b9TAefnAy9PO4gTKzSD p866MQPgCfQxaG
Wi1r4/04O5mwjKlAesMtkp4=
=qlzq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--huq684BweRXVnRxX--

--===============1611641296==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
stunnel-users@mirt.net
http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

--===============1611641296==--
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0