This is a discussion on [stunnel-users] Stunnel Scalability Question within the Stunnel Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; This is a multipart message in MIME format. --===============0814686821== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_=" This is ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--===============0814686821== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_=" This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi, I have an application with the following characteristics and am trying to determine if Stunnel would be a suitable option for securing my transmissions (in particular, will it scale): - Each of my clients is connected to the Internet via a 56Kbps modem. My server has whatever bandwidth it needs. - Each client "transaction" consists of (a) connecting to a central server using a TCP/IP-based protocol, (b) uploading a 512KB block of data and (c) disconnecting. - Our server needs to be able to handle 2000 concurrent clients under peak loads. - Under the peak load above, I would like to limit the time a client takes to perform a "transaction" to around five minutes or so (uploading 512KB at (56Kbps / 2) = 28Kbps should take ~2.5 minutes). My questions are: (1) Do I have any reason to believe that Stunnel will simply not be able to scale to handle the load described above (i.e. a steady load of 2000 concurrent clients connecting, uploading half a megabyte of data and disconnecting)? (2) If Stunnel can handle this - do you have any thoughts on what sort of machine (or machines) I should be running my server-side Stunnel daemon(s) on? I am particularly concerned about CPU usage. I apologize in advance for any overlap between this query and past threads in the archive/information on the website - I wanted to make sure that I ran the specific requirements above past somebody with experience using Stunnel. Thanks, Ankur --=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi,</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I have an application with the following characteristics and am trying to determine if Stunnel would be a suitable option for securing my transmissions (in particular, will it scale):</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Each of my clients is connected to the Internet via a 56Kbps modem. My server has whatever bandwidth it needs.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Each client "transaction" consists of (a) connecting to a central server using a TCP/IP-based protocol, (b) uploading a 512KB block of data and (c) disconnecting.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Our server needs to be able to handle 2000 concurrent clients under peak loads.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Under the peak load above, I would like to limit the time a client takes to perform a "transaction" to around five minutes or so (uploading 512KB at (56Kbps / 2) = 28Kbps should take ~2.5 minutes). </font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">My questions are:</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">(1) Do I have any reason to believe that Stunnel will simply not be able to scale to handle the load described above (i.e. a steady load of 2000 concurrent clients connecting, uploading half a megabyte of data and disconnecting)?</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">(2) If Stunnel can handle this - do you have any thoughts on what sort of machine (or machines) I should be running my server-side Stunnel daemon(s) on? I am particularly concerned about CPU usage.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I apologize in advance for any overlap between this query and past threads in the archive/information on the website - I wanted to make sure that I ran the specific requirements above past somebody with experience using Stunnel.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks,<br> <br> Ankur</font> --=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_=-- --===============0814686821== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users@mirt.net http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users --===============0814686821==-- |