[stunnel-users] Stunnel Scalability Question

This is a discussion on [stunnel-users] Stunnel Scalability Question within the Stunnel Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; This is a multipart message in MIME format. --===============0814686821== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_=" This is ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > Stunnel Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2007
Ankur Upadhyaya
 
Posts: n/a
Default [stunnel-users] Stunnel Scalability Question

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--===============0814686821==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_="

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Hi,

I have an application with the following characteristics and am trying to
determine if Stunnel would be a suitable option for securing my
transmissions (in particular, will it scale):

- Each of my clients is connected to the Internet via a 56Kbps modem. My
server has whatever bandwidth it needs.

- Each client "transaction" consists of (a) connecting to a central server
using a TCP/IP-based protocol, (b) uploading a 512KB block of data and (c)
disconnecting.

- Our server needs to be able to handle 2000 concurrent clients under peak
loads.

- Under the peak load above, I would like to limit the time a client takes
to perform a "transaction" to around five minutes or so (uploading 512KB
at (56Kbps / 2) = 28Kbps should take ~2.5 minutes).

My questions are:

(1) Do I have any reason to believe that Stunnel will simply not be able
to scale to handle the load described above (i.e. a steady load of 2000
concurrent clients connecting, uploading half a megabyte of data and
disconnecting)?

(2) If Stunnel can handle this - do you have any thoughts on what sort of
machine (or machines) I should be running my server-side Stunnel daemon(s)
on? I am particularly concerned about CPU usage.

I apologize in advance for any overlap between this query and past threads
in the archive/information on the website - I wanted to make sure that I
ran the specific requirements above past somebody with experience using
Stunnel.

Thanks,

Ankur
--=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I have an application with the following
characteristics and am trying to determine if Stunnel would be a suitable
option for securing my transmissions (in particular, will it scale):</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Each of my clients is connected to
the Internet via a 56Kbps modem. &nbsp;My server has whatever bandwidth
it needs.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Each client &quot;transaction&quot;
consists of (a) connecting to a central server using a TCP/IP-based protocol,
(b) uploading a 512KB block of data and (c) disconnecting.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Our server needs to be able to handle
2000 concurrent clients under peak loads.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Under the peak load above, I would
like to limit the time a client takes to perform a &quot;transaction&quot;
to around five minutes or so (uploading 512KB at (56Kbps / 2) = 28Kbps
should take ~2.5 minutes). &nbsp;</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">My questions are:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">(1) Do I have any reason to believe
that Stunnel will simply not be able to scale to handle the load described
above (i.e. a steady load of 2000 concurrent clients connecting, uploading
half a megabyte of data and disconnecting)?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">(2) If Stunnel can handle this - do
you have any thoughts on what sort of machine (or machines) I should be
running my server-side Stunnel daemon(s) on? &nbsp;I am particularly concerned
about CPU usage.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I apologize in advance for any overlap
between this query and past threads in the archive/information on the website
- I wanted to make sure that I ran the specific requirements above past
somebody with experience using Stunnel.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks,<br>
<br>
Ankur</font>
--=_alternative 005ECAE98825731C_=--

--===============0814686821==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
stunnel-users@mirt.net
http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

--===============0814686821==--
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0