Re: [stunnel-users] Problem in Stunnel with too many connections

This is a discussion on Re: [stunnel-users] Problem in Stunnel with too many connections within the Stunnel Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; --===============0200803038== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1263129.htqVoxxKU5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > Stunnel Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2006
Michal Trojnara
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [stunnel-users] Problem in Stunnel with too many connections

--===============0200803038==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1263129.htqVoxxKU5";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1263129.htqVoxxKU5
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 29 November 2006 16:56, ~ Kunal Sharma ~ wrote:
> I downloaded Stunnel from stunnel.org and had no idea I have a new version
> at *the home site*.


I see. This page should put some light on it:
http://www.stunnel.org/related/

Brian Hatch, the author of www.stunnel.org web page did a great
job building the page, writing documentation, patches, etc.
Unfortunately he is quite busy nowadays, so the page is becoming
obsolete and misleading.

> But with the same version, I made the change suggested by you
> (TIMEOUTidle =3D 30) and Stunnel has now being working for
> more than 18 hrs on the trot now !!!
>=20
> Can you please explain to me (only if you have time) what magic
> this did ?=20


By default stunnel tries to keep idle (not transferring any traffic)=20
connections up for 43200 seconds (12 hours). It's generally a good idea=20
(imagine a telnet or an irc session). The drawback is that when a client h=
as=20
disconnected without shutting down or resetting TCP session (like it was=20
turned off with the power switch or the the network cable was pulled off)=20
stunnel server uses server resources (like a cpu thread, memory or tcp=20
sockets) for the next 12 hours. That's not good on a heavy loaded server. =
=20
Reducing the idle timeout from 43200 to 30 seconds eliminates this problem.

Best regards,
Mike

--nextPart1263129.htqVoxxKU5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFbeqJ/NU+nXTHMtERAkrbAJ9B+4YPuhFipIZsNFE9IhlHLNLX0QCg7PU o
jOzvidlUUTT65ua5leBgGR4=
=gavg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1263129.htqVoxxKU5--

--===============0200803038==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
stunnel-users@mirt.net
http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

--===============0200803038==--
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0