This is a discussion on [stunnel-users] stunnel library inconsistencies within the Stunnel Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1873049318== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_16B5_01C60BDE.0BB0CFE0" This ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============1873049318== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_16B5_01C60BDE.0BB0CFE0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_16B5_01C60BDE.0BB0CFE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I've been using stunnel 4.08 on an embedded Linux platform for a while = now, and am attempting to move to the 2.6 kernel from the 2.4.20, which = has changed my building platform. I am cross-compiling with libs and = tools targeted for the embedded system, which is an i486 type AMD Elan = chip. I have tried 4.08, 4.14 and 4.15b, all with the same result. Everything = looks to compile properly, but when running stunnel I get the following: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-minimal.c: 134: realloc: Assertion = `ptr =3D=3D alloc_last_block' failed! strace doesn't supply any helpful information. I have tried building = with and without tcpwrappers, and have tried libssl 0.9.7g and 0.9.7i. = Libssl v0.9.8a doesn't seem to play very nice. Anyone able to look at my config.log? It's 140k uncompressed, but will = zip it up if needed. Thanks, -Brian ------=_NextPart_000_16B5_01C60BDE.0BB0CFE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I've been using stunnel 4.08 on an = embedded Linux=20 platform for a while now, and am attempting to move to the 2.6 kernel = from the=20 2.4.20, which has changed my building platform. I am = cross-compiling with=20 libs and tools targeted for the embedded system, which is an i486 type = AMD Elan=20 chip.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have tried 4.08, 4.14 and 4.15b, all = with the=20 same result. Everything looks to compile properly, but when running = stunnel I=20 get the following:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Inconsistency detected by ld.so: = dl-minimal.c: 134:=20 realloc: Assertion `ptr =3D=3D alloc_last_block' failed!</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>strace doesn't supply any helpful=20 information. I have tried building with and without = tcpwrappers, and=20 have tried libssl 0.9.7g and 0.9.7i. Libssl v0.9.8a doesn't seem = to play=20 very nice.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Anyone able to look at my = config.log? It's=20 140k uncompressed, but will zip it up if needed.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>-Brian</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_16B5_01C60BDE.0BB0CFE0-- --===============1873049318== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users@mirt.net http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users --===============1873049318==-- |