Re: [stunnel-users] IMAP TLS support in stunnel 4?

--===============0696498769==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart14662213.i2F5QmlAP7";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart14662213.i2F5QmlAP7
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 08 of October 2005 03:09, George Hartzell wrote:
> I'd like to put stunnel in front of dbmail-imap and dbmail-pop, since
> they don't offer any encryption. I understand I can just do straight
> ssl connections, but would like [prefer] to support TLS.
>
> I've found patches to the stunnel 3 series that implement TLS for
> IMAP, but haven't found any for version 4.
>
> Has someone implemented it for 4?
>
> Is there a technical or political reason/problem, or just not enough
> round-tuits?

Most email clients use SSL over IMAP on a separate port that stunnel supports.
Do you really need protocol negotiation?

Best regards,
Mike

--nextPart14662213.i2F5QmlAP7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDR2G5/NU+nXTHMtERAhVdAJ9SJrV0YFlH53asIWv/sVk+S7Es+ACfVoDT
o5tz1C3X4ez2L5up9x0wRzU=
=gEeQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart14662213.i2F5QmlAP7--

--===============0696498769==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
stunnel-users@mirt.net
http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

--===============0696498769==--