Re: [stunnel-users] Passphrase validation

--===============1303354893==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"
Content-Disposition: inline


--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:33:33PM +0200, Jan Meijer wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Peter Pentes wrote:
> >Sorry, what I am referring to here is actually the
> >passphrase for the private keys, and how Stunnel does
> >not support encrypted private keys.
>=20
> Sorry to interrupt only this late in the thread *but* what gave you the=
=20
> impression stunnel does not support encrypted private keys? AFAIK it=20
> works on both the unix platform (has done for many years) and since a=20
> couple of years it also supports it on the Windows platform (I should=20
> know as I have sponsored the latter into stunnel *and* we've been using=
=20
> it for many years now.
>=20
> Or perhaps I'm not understanding your question/problem correctly?
>=20
> Jan

Oh,

% stunnel stunnel.conf
2005.06.27 16:50:37 LOG5[97316:134639616]: stunnel 4.10 on i386-unknown-fre=
ebsd5.4 PTHREAD+POLL+IPv4+LIBWRAP with OpenSSL 0.9.7e 25 Oct 2004
Enter PEM pass phrase:

It seems that stunnel supports encrypted private keys ;-)
This really makes me laugh when I look at the size of this thread :-)

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCwAbuFw6SP/bBpCARAjEmAKCM5fqGtlkeSJpbU8O/m6uka8uS7wCfUwZW
0LcjZ0TlCS2W0OxShQ+UHEA=
=C543
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--

--===============1303354893==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
stunnel-users@mirt.net
http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

--===============1303354893==--