RE: [squid-users] Squid dstdomain ACL

This is a discussion on RE: [squid-users] Squid dstdomain ACL within the Squid Users forums, part of the Web Server and Related Forums category; > Thanks Duane. Unfortunately, my domains list is HUGE (~600,000 domains) and > the cache already runs at 50-...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Web Server and Related Forums > Squid Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2003
Duane Wessels
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: [squid-users] Squid dstdomain ACL

> Thanks Duane. Unfortunately, my domains list is HUGE (~600,000 domains) and
> the cache already runs at 50-95% CPU during the day, most of which I assume
> is due to the huge domains list. If I were to lose the dstdomain ACL and
> only use url_regex, would performance stay where it is? Sadly, I can't use
> the second option you mention because google's cache is useful for other
> non-offensive websites.


Switching from dstdomain to url_regex will likely be much less
efficient. dstdomain searching is probably O(log N), while url_regex
searching is O(N).

There are some redirectors (like Squirm, Jersed, and squidGuard) that claim
to be very fast and efficient. You might be able to do regex searching with
them faster than with Squid's internal implementation. A nice thing about
redirectors, too, is that you can test them separately before you configure
Squid to use them.

Duane W.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0