Re: [squid-users] Squid IPCache v. BIND Caching-Only DNS

This is a discussion on Re: [squid-users] Squid IPCache v. BIND Caching-Only DNS within the Squid Users forums, part of the Web Server and Related Forums category; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mahmood Ahmed" <braveheart@buraak.net.pk> To: "Venkatesh. K" <venkatesh@...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Web Server and Related Forums > Squid Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2003
Venkatesh. K
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [squid-users] Squid IPCache v. BIND Caching-Only DNS


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mahmood Ahmed" <braveheart@buraak.net.pk>
To: "Venkatesh. K" <venkatesh@cbayscribe.com>; <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Cc: <squid-users-return-37482-braveheart=buraak.net.pk@squid-cache.org>;
"Cafe Admin" <cafeadmin@comcast.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid IPCache v. BIND Caching-Only DNS


>
> does it means that if iam running transparent proxy and running DNS also i
> do not need the ip_cache at all ?


Nope. It is better to cache dns lookups in squid even though you end up
using some memory for ip and dns cache in squid.

I don't have real stats on the performance hit if squid does not cache ip
and name lookups, but I like to play safe.

Venkatesh K

>
> Reagrds
>
> Mahmood Ahmed
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> This mail has been sent using Buraak Net's Mailing System
> (http://www.buraak.net.pk)
>
> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: "Venkatesh. K" <venkatesh@cbayscribe.com>
> To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Cc: "Cafe Admin" <cafeadmin@comcast.net>
> Sent: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 07:52:16 +0530
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid IPCache v. BIND Caching-Only DNS
>
> > If you are using squid as transparent cache, your clients would still

need
> > to do dns lookups. You would be better off with a caching only dns

server
> > unless your clients are configured to use squid as proxy server.
> >
> > Venkatesh K
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cafe Admin" <cafeadmin@comcast.net>
> > To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 7:09 AM
> > Subject: [squid-users] Squid IPCache v. BIND Caching-Only DNS
> >
> > > Does any one know if there is any advantage to setting up a BIND
> > > caching-only DNS server on my private network (not registered domain)?

I
> > > plan to have my squid box point to it instead of going directly to my

> > ISP's
> > > DNS servers.
> > > I feel that IPCache in Squid serves the same purpose. i.e any DNS

entry
> > that
> > > is expired in IPCache is also expired in BIND so DNS lookup will be

done
> > no
> > > matter what. I'm looking for a better response time so I thought this

> > would
> > > help. Let me know if think (or know) BIND wouldn't make a difference.

> > Thanks
> > > in advance for your comments.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >

> ------- End of Original Message -------
>
>


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0