Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

RE: [squid-users] Squid NT vs. Squid Linux

This is a discussion on RE: [squid-users] Squid NT vs. Squid Linux within the Squid Users forums, part of the Web Server and Related Forums category; Thanks Serassio and Adam for your feedback. I look briefly at Samba 3.0 and it looks like it will ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Web Server and Related Forums > Squid Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2003
Cafe Admin
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: [squid-users] Squid NT vs. Squid Linux


Thanks Serassio and Adam for your feedback. I look briefly at Samba 3.0 and
it looks like it will do the job for me. I need to read a little more about
it to be able to configure it.

As Serassio pointed out WAN bandwidth would be my bottleneck. I'm painfully
aware of this fact: but unfortunately bandwidth isn't readily available and
the little available is quite expensive in where this LAN is.

Any recommendation on what hardware can comfortably handle 30-50 clients? As
you can see I'm counting on Squid to solve a little of my bandwidth problem.
I wouldn't want Squid to become the bottleneck instead so I don't mind
investing in a slightly higher performance hardware for Squid if that would
help.

Thanks again for your response.


-----Original Message-----
From: Serassio Guido [mailto:guido.serassio@acmeconsulting.it]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 2:47 AM
To: Cafe Admin; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid NT vs. Squid Linux


Hi,

At 04.33 15/11/2003, Cafe Admin wrote:

>Hi All,
>Does any one know if there is any noticeable peformance difference between
>Squid on Windows 2000 Server and on RedHat Linux 9? I'm currently running
>2.5-Stable3 on a dedicated RH9 box, and I know my hardware is being
>underutlized (2.0GHz Xeon , 2x10k RPM SCSI, 640MB, 1000Mbps NIC). I'm
>thinking about converting the machine to Windows File Server/PDC/SquidNT.
>Serving 30 clients on 100MB network (who are constantly surfing the Net)
>with 256Kbps connection to the Internet. As always thanks for your

feedback.

In the Windows port there are still some limitations:

- Max. 2048 File Descriptors, so more than 100 concurrent client cannot be
safely supported
- The internal socket loop is select() based vs poll() or better on
Unix/Linux
- Transparent proxy is not available
- Some async FS storage are not available (COSS, diskd)

So currently I expect always better performance from a Linux/Unix based
Squid.

In Your configuration I think that major bottleneck can be the line speed:
today an Internet bandwidth of 256 Kbit/s for 30 concurrent web client can
be very low.

Regards

Guido



-
================================================== ======
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l.
Via Gorizia, 69 10136 - Torino - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.3249426 Fax. : +39.011.3293665
Email: guido.serassio@acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/



Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0