This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] postscan within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Jeff Kell wrote: > I don't know about the original environment, but P2P programs will drive > portscan detectors ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Jeff Kell wrote:
> I don't know about the original environment, but P2P programs will drive > portscan detectors absolutely nuts when they "search" peers for a target. Are they likely to fire decoy detection rules? I infer a lot of decoyed traffic to 1026/UDP and 1027/UDP from the number of ICMP Unreach messages I've been receiving in which the original datagram src IP was forged (to one of my addresses). ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users |