Re: Fw: [Snort-users] snort not reporting

This is a discussion on Re: Fw: [Snort-users] snort not reporting within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Allan, sorry you are right. -A is for alerts and -b is for binary logging. The log file is deleted ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2004
Ben van der Merwe
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fw: [Snort-users] snort not reporting

Allan, sorry you are right. -A is for alerts and -b is for binary logging.
The log file is deleted because it is empty. This is also the reason why
there are no alerts.

You can try to verify the traffic generated by ppp0. It should not be 0 if
you have a successful connection and do some stuff. Try using a tool like
etherape or ethereal to monitor your ppp0 sensor. It should generate traffic
in logging (-b) mode. On linux 'dmesg' will also be helpful in identifying
some other problems.

Let me know if you can detect the traffic in any way using another tool.

Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: "Allan Jensen" <tubajensen@yahoo.com>
To: "Ben van der Merwe" <benm@pasco.co.za>
Cc: "Snort Users" <snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Snort-users] snort not reporting


> Ben,
>
> I tried this command:
>
> sudo snort -bi ppp0 -c /etc/snort/snort.conf
>
> (-b Log packets in tcpdump format)
>
> The -A option just sets the alert mode (That's not
> what I want - is it?)
> Using the -b option I find a file in /var/log/snort
> named:
>
> -rw------- 1 root wheel 0 14 Dec 11:35
> snort.log.1103020543
>
> As you can see it's size is 0. It also disappears when
> I quit snort.
>
> Allan.
>
>
> --- Ben van der Merwe <benm@pasco.co.za> wrote:
>
>> Allan,
>>
>> I experienced the same problem when I first tried
>> snort (with rules),
>> but my project only focused on binary logging so I
>> did not get the
>> opportunity to fix it. That may be a good idea - try
>> out the binary
>> logging (I think there is a '-A' option then) and
>> make sure that the
>> traffic is logged to a binary file. You can then
>> inspect the traffic
>> with tools like 'ethereal', 'etherape' and
>> 'tcpdump'. At least you can
>> narrow down the problem area in this way.

>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0