Re: [Snort-users] Problem with the -o option
This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] Problem with the -o option within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; At 10:50 AM 11/5/2004, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote: >1. When listing the -o option, do I ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
11-05-2004
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [Snort-users] Problem with the -o option
At 10:50 AM 11/5/2004, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
>1. When listing the -o option, do I need to include the full path the >policy-based.rules file similarly to how it is done for the -c snort.conf >file? erm, -o does not take any filenames as a parameter. It's just a flag that changes the rule processing. It's just -o not "-o file" or "-o /path/file". add policy-based-rules to your snort.conf as an include. Don't pass it on the command-line. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users 
|
Linear Mode
