Re: [Snort-users] Multiple instances of snort on one box?

This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] Multiple instances of snort on one box? within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; At 03:39 PM 10/21/2004, Drew Stockman wrote: >We are trying to consolidate machines and I am ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2004
Matt Kettler
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Snort-users] Multiple instances of snort on one box?

At 03:39 PM 10/21/2004, Drew Stockman wrote:
>We are trying to consolidate machines and I am being asked if we can put
>all of the snort sensors on one box. I was just wondering if anyone can
>point me in the right direction. I believe I have to run seperate
>instances of Snort listening on different NICs, correct?


Depends a bit on your OS.. Most linuxes will support -i "any" which will
allow a single snort process to sniff all three.. However, your results
will be mixed together.

It is however quite possible to run multiple snorts.

>Also, what kind of hardware would it take to replace 3 sensors, each
>listening to a T-1 connection?



Sniffing 3 t1's is 9mbit/sec max cross-section. 3 * (1.5 in +1.5 out) =
9mbit/sec

That shouldn't be terribly hard for even a low-end box to handle. I used to
monitor a single t1 using Snort 2.0 on a 133mhz Pentium I without much
trouble, provided I disabled spp_conversation and portscan2. Admittedly
this was pre-pcre, but it's a starting point.

If a single t1 can be monitored on a p-133, 3 should be able to be handled
on a 400mhz box. There's a good bit of overhead to PCRE, but there's also a
big difference between a Pentium and a Pentium II or better, even at the
same clock.

Provided your NIC's aren't realtek 8139's or similar inefficient cheap
cards, and you use efficient logging (ie: ascii-mode packet dumps) you
should be able to handle it on a PII-400 or better. But I'd consider this a
minimum, a little extra CPU never hurt.

Make sure you've got about 40mb of ram for each snort, plus a minimum of
64mb for the OS, etc. So I'd say 192mb of ram really should be your minimum
goal.

If you want to run acid/sql on this box, double all of the above minimums.


> Is there any documentation out there on setting up a multiple Snort
> sensor like this?



Shouldn't be difficult.. Particularly if you chroot them with -t.





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjourna...uidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0