Re: [Snort-users] IDS Question

This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] IDS Question within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Halliday" <paul.halliday@gmail.com> To: <snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net&...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2004
Bill Parker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Snort-users] IDS Question


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Halliday" <paul.halliday@gmail.com>
To: <snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 9:33 AM
Subject: [Snort-users] IDS Question


> I work at a small community college and I want to implement an IDS
> solution for one of the campuses. There is approximately 400 machines
> here utilizing a 5mbit link. Bandwidth on this link is typically
> between 1.5-2 mbit.
>
> What I have so far is a freebsd box running snort, ipfm, and openbsd's
> pf. Basically I want to monitor suspicious activity/excessive
> bandwidth usage and tickle the packet filter rules accordingly so that
> we may isolate/block the traffic for further analysis.
>
> If I had 2 gigabit nics, one in one out, and maybe another 100mbit nic
> acting as the monitor (passive tap) would this box be able to do its
> job without introducing lag? I would basically be placing the box
> between the main switch and a cisco 2600. My biggest concern is
> whether or not the forwarding of all this traffic though the machine
> will introduce latency, and if so how much. I would suspect that
> because all the info is being picked up on the passive tap that things
> shouldnt slow down too much.


I have a Pent III-500 (SuSE 8.0 Pro Linux) using snort 2.2.0 in daemon mode
which sniffs
an avg of 1-2mbit/sec traffic with no packet drops at all. Using 10/100
NIC, connected to
the internal i/f of the PIX via a span port on our 3550. This box has 256MB
of RAM,
a 8GB SCSI (20mbit/sec Transfer Rate), and 3 x dual 10/100 Intel NIC's
w/400mbit/sec
throughput (per card), our environment is 4 T-1's (max of 6mbit/sec
bi-directional).

If you use cisco switches, look at enabling port monitor or port span to
mirror all of your
traffic onto a single port on the switch, and this is where you attach your
snort sensor.

I'd imagine this box could easily analyze 5-10mbit/sec w/NO problem what so
ever
(this machine was built out of spare parts, btw), and the NIC's which handle
snort are
set up in promisc. mode w/NO ip address assigned to the card to cut down on
traffic
from the box itself.

Bill



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0