This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] Smb output within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; The slow(er) part is having the nmblookup take IP -> NetBIOS name then using that with smbclient to generate ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
The slow(er) part is having the nmblookup take IP -> NetBIOS name
then using that with smbclient to generate the WinPopUp message. Maybe I'm doing it a broken way...that's what I have now tho. So you lose 'time' by calling multiple external programs and waiting for them to return. -=Mike On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 03:42:51PM -0500, Frank Knobbe wrote: > On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 01:22, Nerijus Krukauskas wrote: > > Smb alerting would be soooo sloooow, that snort would start > > dropping packets very soon and very fast. > > Is that really the case? Isn't the SMB alert just a single UDP packet? > If so, it would be comparable to a TCP reset packet. Does that slow > Snort down that much? Perhaps the SMB plugin just needs to be optimized > properly... > > Regards, > Frank > -- The New Testament offers the basis for modern computer coding theory, in the form of an affirmation of the binary number system. But let your communication be Yea, yea; nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil. -- Matthew 5:37 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|