This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] Barnyard's explained within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Hi Jason, > Obviously it would be best to have Snort dump to disk (unified format), and > to rsync ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hi Jason,
> Obviously it would be best to have Snort dump to disk (unified format), and > to rsync that data at (say) ten-minute intervals to a SEPARATE box, which > has barnyard to dump the data into a SQL DB. That way there's nothing by I/O > and network traffic involved in generating the data - all the CPU is > available for "pure" sniffing. maybe you should take a look at FLoP: http://www.geschke-online.de/FLoP/ This project does something similar, all output is written to a unix socket where another process reads this data and simply forwards it to a central server running a further process which feeds the database. The INSERTs on the central server are done via an unix domain socket and not via TCP so it should be by far faster. (And at least you don't even need a hard disk on your sensor...) Best regards Dirk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users |