Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Re: [Snort-users] Ok, Ok - I know - http_inspect

This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] Ok, Ok - I know - http_inspect within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; What are you trying to do? Those alerts look legitimate, as in, you configure http_inspect_server to only notify you of ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2004
sekure
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Snort-users] Ok, Ok - I know - http_inspect

What are you trying to do? Those alerts look legitimate, as in, you
configure http_inspect_server to only notify you of attacks it spots
in URI content, and according to snort documentation "When enabled,
only the URI portion of HTTP requests will be inspected for attacks.
As this field usually contains 90-95% of the web attacks, you'll catch
most of the attacks."

So you are still getting the alerts. I couldn't find an acceptible
configuration of http_inspect_server which didn't generate a ton of
false positives, and i tried EVERYTHING. I still wanted to be able to
use the uricontent keyword, so i needed http_inspect, so i defined
http_inspect_server as:

preprocessor http_inspect_server: server default \
profile apache \
ports { 80 8080 } \
no_alerts

The no_alerts stops all of the gen_id 119 alerts from showing up.

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:04:34 -0700 (PDT), Snortty <cwcwcwg@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I have set up to enable inspect_uri_only:
>
> preprocessor http_inspect_server: server default \
> profile all ports { 80 8080 8180 }
> oversize_dir_length 500 inspect_uri_only
>
> and when I run snort, it did show:
>
> Only inspect URI: YES
>
> but I still have hundreds of http_inspect alerts in
> short period of time, like the kinds:
>
> [**] [119:15:1] (http_inspect) OVERSIZE REQUEST-URI
> DIRECTORY [**]
> [**] [119:13:1] (http_inspect) NON-RFC HTTP DELIMITER
> [**]
> [**] [119:16:1] (http_inspect) OVERSIZE CHUNK ENCODING
> [**]
> [**] [119:4:1] (http_inspect) BARE BYTE UNICODE
> ENCODING [**]
> [**] [119:12:1] (http_inspect) APACHE WHITESPACE (TAB)
> [**]
> [**] [119:2:1] (http_inspect) DOUBLE DECODING ATTACK
> [**]
>
> Can someone shed some lights on it please?
>
> Thanks
> Sw.

---snipped---


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0