Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Re: [Snort-users] using a tap

This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] using a tap within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 13:41, Altrock, Jens wrote: > hi there, > we're thinking about buying ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2004
Michael Boman
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Snort-users] using a tap

On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 13:41, Altrock, Jens wrote:
> hi there,
> we're thinking about buying a tap too, but there are some questions that I
> need to be answered before:
>
> 1. Taps use to channels to get the traffic to the monitoring device (one for
> RX and one for TX). How do I "bond" these channels
> together, if I do need to do that?


Please state your operating system. With Linux you do 'ifenslave', and
if you use a RedHat based distribution
http://www.linuxgazette.com/node/view/8937 might be of help.

> 2. It is a security violation when using a Sensor connected to the Tap and
> (!) to the internal net (with IP), but it is needed anyway for updating
> rules and
> other issues. Is it anyway reliable?


The tap is a read only connection, and you need a way to:
a) View the alerts
b) Update the signatures

which usually mean one more cable to a special analyst LAN (or your
local LAN, depending how much money you have to spend..). You can have
an semi air-gapped NIDS sensor, where the only connection is the TAP. If
you are in that situation You have to use the plain ol' sneaker net to
transfer signature updates (hint: a USB thumb drive stores bigger files
and are more reliable then the old 3.5" floppies). For system updates:
well, they do 1 GB thumb drives now days..

Also, in those circumstances you (should) have a different PC just
beside it to do the lookups and signature research. Won't be as
effective, but it is doable.. So far I have only seen military
installations of this kind, but what-ever floats your boat...

And when it comes to reliability of the setup: as long as you don't
transfer data from the sensor to the internal network you don't expose
the LAN to any additional dangers..

Best regards
Michael Boman

--
Michael Boman <michael.boman@boseco.com>
BOSECO Internet Security Solutions - http://www.boseco.com



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0