This is a discussion on [Snort-users] flow-portscan. within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Hi all, I was hoping someone could clarify something about flow-portscan's alerting. I'm using unified output w/...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hi all,
I was hoping someone could clarify something about flow-portscan's alerting. I'm using unified output w/mudpit. From what i could gather reading the Snort docs, the flow-portscan module uses the logging sub-system to send it's alerts when it is configured with "output-mode pktkludge" (so it generates a fake pkt, i assume since unified output cannot handle variable text in alert messages). Since i have both logging and alert streams feeding into mudpit, i'm wondering why i'm not getting anything out of flow-portscan? gen-msg.map contains the SIDs for GID 121, and is also configured with mudpit. Also, server-watchnet is configured for the network to be monitored. Was hoping someone could explain the way it's supposed to work, in the case of unified output? Thanks, Chris. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users |