RE: [Snort-users] Low Snort performances

This is a discussion on RE: [Snort-users] Low Snort performances within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; I am pretty sure SMP support has been around in FreeBSD for longer than that - I think BSD was later. ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2004
Bob Walder
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: [Snort-users] Low Snort performances

I am pretty sure SMP support has been around in FreeBSD for longer than
that - I think BSD was later. That was one of the reasons we first tried
it out. Had nothing but good results from it in our labs - very
reliable. YMMV, of course.....

We have not managed to test a Gigabit Snort appliance as yet.

Regards,

Bob


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: todb@planb-security.net [mailto:todb@planb-security.net]
>> Sent: 19 April 2004 15:23
>> To: bwalder@spamcop.net
>> Cc: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Low Snort performances
>>
>>
>> Bob Walder wrote:
>>
>> > We were using a dual P4 box with a server-class chipset,

>> 2GB RAM and
>> > Intel NICs. [...] I can say that one of the main

>> differences between
>> > our test rig and your sensor is that we used FreeBSD for the
>> > underlying OS.

>>
>> I haven't seen many reports of Snort successfully running on
>> *BSD with SMP. I don't follow the BSDs very closely, but I
>> know SMP support fairly new (1 year?) in FreeBSD....
>> Googling... yep. http://www.freebsd.org/smp/ . Well, that
>> makes me happy.
>>
>> The lack of reliable BSD multiprocessor support has been The
>> Reason I've been advocating Snort (and other things) on
>> Linux lately. I may have to change my tune.
>>
>> While I'm posting, I may as well ask (I've hunted around in
>> the archives, but I couldn't find a definitive answer): Does
>> anyone have handy some benchmark results for Snort on
>> various architectures? I'm primarily interested in hearing
>> about lab/real world experiences with Snort's maximum
>> network loads, depending on architecture -- both the sensor
>> and whatever backend processing (acid etc). I can't find
>> much about Snort and gigabit loads, aside from the fact that
>> Sourcefire sells a gigabit IDS toaster.
>>
>> --
>> Tod Beardsley | planb-security.net
>>





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0