Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Re: [Snort-users] Block

This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] Block within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; --On Monday, February 16, 2004 4:46 PM -0600 Frank Knobbe <frank@knobbe.us> wrote: > > Uhm, ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2004
Paul Schmehl
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Snort-users] Block

--On Monday, February 16, 2004 4:46 PM -0600 Frank Knobbe <frank@knobbe.us>
wrote:
>
> Uhm, I'm not sure about that, Paul. I've heard from folks that caught
> new viruses with Clamav before Norton got it. Matter the fact, just
> recently there was a posting somewhere (I'm sure you've seen that since
> you are on most lists) that showed that clamav had a signature for it
> first.
>
> I have nothing but pleasant experience with clamav. I can't believe how
> well it works for being OpenSource.


I'm answering on list only because I do not want to leave the wrong
impression. clamav is certainly better than nothing, and if that's all you
can afford, then by all means use it. What I *am* saying is that testing
by the researchers at the University of Hamburg has shown that its
detection rate is *not* comparable to commercial scanners. So long as you
understand that, using clamav can be a useful part of an overall strategy
to limit exposure to viruses.

No virus scanner is perfect, and clamav will catch viruses that other
scanners will miss, and vice versa. Use of *any* gateway av scanner should
be supplemented by other strategies such as extension blocking to provide
the best possible protection.

However, anecdotal evidence notwithstanding, in controlled studies using
standard research methodology, clamav did not measure up to commercial
scanners. Please note, I am a fan of open source, and I am not trying to
discourage the use of clamav. I just think people should use software in
an informed manner.

These tests were done and published on a private list, so I cannot publish
the details. I do not know if the university will publish the details on
their website.

<http://agn-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/vtc/naveng.htm>

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0