Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Re: [Snort-users] Snort, Mudpit, Unified logs and me...

This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] Snort, Mudpit, Unified logs and me... within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Hi Russel, > I'm trying to set up what I think is "a normal" system pair: > = &...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2004
Dirk Geschke
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Snort-users] Snort, Mudpit, Unified logs and me...

Hi Russel,

> I'm trying to set up what I think is "a normal" system pair:
> =


> System 1: The Snort machine (Devil)
> System 2: The log processing / alerting machine (Slackware 9.x)
> =


> Having done lots and lots of reading, it seems that the unified (binary=

)
> output is "best" (as non-unified seems to lead to problems).
> =


> [As a side note, I did look at FLoP but patching snort is not an =


> option due to the fact that I'm using a pre-built live-CD for system 1]=



hmm, I think this should be a minor problem. But how do you update snort
if it is so difficult to use a patched and self-compiled version of snort=
?

With all possible options you have to extend your live-CD by some =

programs.

> Now, it seems that I have two options on system 2 - either Barnyard
> or Mudpit. Seeing as I can't get Barnyard to configure (tried MySQL
> 3.23, 4.017, my_connect, mysql_real_connect and all those other "fixes"=


> to no avail), I'm forced to use Mudpit.


I fear that if Barnyard is not able to work then Mudpit will fail
with the same problems....

[...]

> Hm. This raises 2 questions:
> =


> 1.) How does one specifiy that these two files should actually
> be sent on a remote machine? In the MySQL example, it is =


> obvious that you can specify a host, but mudput requires the =


> files :/
> =


> 2.) As these log files need to reside on a remote system, how =


> would the limit work?


The log files are created by the snort process and should stay on
the local machine. This is the place where both, barnyard and
mudpit expect the files.

As you are using a Live-CD I think you will not use any harddisk
on the snort machine?

You can do at least two things: Store the files on a ram disk
or on a nfs mounted partition. But both are options are not =

really good...

So maybe FLoP is not such a bad idea for this system?

Best regards

Dirk



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0