Re: [Snort-users] heavily switched networks

--- Stewart Larsen <slarsen42@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> Well, you tell me. As a network admin in charge of security,
> should I
> be worried about intra-network traffic?
>
> Would I be better off running a host-based IDS like tripwire
> on the
> servers I care about and only sniffing the uplink?
>
> This is all theoretical, BTW. But I'm researching for future
> opportunities.
>

Well yeah, I would definitely worry about intra-network traffic.
And in this case I believe it would be much simpler to buy
fewer switches with a port mirroring capability than to tap all
those lines or run host-based snort.

Going with your idea of tripwire and sniffing the uplink is an
option if you are less paranoid or can segregate machines at layer-2.

=====
-----------------------------------------------------------
Only fools have all the answers.
-----------------------------------------------------------

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users