Re: [Snort-users] Who doesn't care about virus rules, and why?

This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] Who doesn't care about virus rules, and why? within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:01:15 -0600, "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls@utdallas.edu> wrote: &...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2003
kenw@kmsi.net
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Snort-users] Who doesn't care about virus rules, and why?

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:01:15 -0600, "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls@utdallas.edu>
wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net=20
>> [mailto:snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of=20
>> kenw@kmsi.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:45 PM
>> To: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [Snort-users] Who doesn't care about virus rules, and why?
>>=20
>> The header of virus.rules says:
>>=20
>> ># NOTE: These rules are NOT being actively maintained.

>> <snip>
>> ># These rules are going away. We don't care about virus=20

>> rules anymore.
>>=20
>> Who are "we", and what makes them think these rules aren't important?
>>=20

>It's not that they aren't important. It's that no one seems to want to


The quote was "We don't care about virus rules anymore." Seems fairly
clear.

>maintain them. Doing so requires a great deal of work, and there *are*
>other, better methods of doing virus detection on a network.


Care to name one that actually gives the IP address of the source of the
attack? None that I'm familiar with do.

>However, it might make sense to maintain a smaller collection of the
>network aware worms, such as Bugbear (which is what is most likely
>driving your customer's printers crazy), Funlove, Qaz, Lovgate, Sobig,
>et. al. The problem is finding someone to do that. I'd volunteer, but
>it's really hard for me to get samples (because of the protections we
>have in place), and I really don't have the time to set up a private
>network, infect a goat and capture its traffic so the signatures can be
>done right.


Neither do I. But I've already effectively volunteered to collect and
redistribute contributions from others as time permits, and in the format
of my own choosing. That's a whole lot better that doing nothing because
we can't do it all.

=46or a lot of computer geeks, we sure seem to have a problem with the
concept of optimization sometimes...

>Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
>Adjunct Information Security Officer
>The University of Texas at Dallas
>AVIEN Founding Member
>http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/=20


/kenw

Ken Wallewein CDP,CNE,MCSE,CCA,CCNA
K&M Systems Integration
Phone (403)274-7848
=46ax (403)275-4535
kenw@kmsi.net
www.kmsi.net


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0