This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] Who doesn't care about virus rules, and why? within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Williams Jon wrote: > What we've ended up doing is monitoring the default route path for > our network ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Williams Jon wrote:
> What we've ended up doing is monitoring the default route path for > our network and watching for either TCP SYNs that are going places > they shouldn't or TCP RST packets generated either by the firewall or > the odd host that is actually hit. With thresholding, we can > generate fairly useful alerts in cases where, in Blaster's case, one > source address sends out TCP port 135 SYN packets to more than X > number of hosts in Y period of time. This is so reliable, in nearly > every case we've used it on, that we are able to auto-generate email > alerts that go to someone else to actually _deal_ with the problem > rather than making the IDS staff track down and call each victim > independantly. We're doing something similar with ICMP on our network, but how can you tell the difference between large numbers of hosts and large numbers of packets to a single host? Would you mind posting one of your rules to illustrate the point? Thanks, Iain. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users |