Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Re: [Snort-users] tippingpoint]]

This is a discussion on Re: [Snort-users] tippingpoint]] within the Snort forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; John seems little bitter :) > "..only implement signatures that have a VERY low rate of false > positive.." &...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Snort

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2003
Geoff
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Snort-users] tippingpoint]]

John seems little bitter :)

> "..only implement signatures that have a VERY low rate of false
> positive.."
> Yeah. That's certainly no problem, whatsoever :-/


It really is not as impossible as you make it sound. Please don't confuse
dropping well known exploits with analysis. That is what IDS is for. Looking for
the strange traffic and correlating known patterns to new compromises will
generate false positives... That's what makes IDS fun, the puzzle that is
analyzing traffic. But I would NEVER drop the packets!!!


> And what do you do about traffic that represents unknown exploits?


That is a whole other discussion but we can chalk it up to... IDS and IPS are a
reactive devices.

>>For example: In our testing we dropped ICMP stacheldraht
>>Agent
>>to Server Hello packets. It is a very easy sig to spot. the word
>>"skillz" inside an ICMP echo reply packet. Rarely are we going to see that
>>one
>>in the wild with Business critical traffic.

>
>
> Stacheldraht? You gotta be kidding. How old is that?


Old.... we had 3 machines on campus that had this tool on them. Sad isn't it.
They were recent compromises the attackers just used an old tool. Goes to show
that you can't through your old sigs away!

> Again, what do you do about the exploits you **don't** know about?


Again....see above :)

>
> Well, duh..


Well put

> You seem very well prepared to protect yourself against the known...


We correlate SourcefireIDS alerts and CSIDS attacks with p0f data, netflow data
and firewall logs in an effort to protect "against the known". But that is not
what we use an IPS for.

so duhh right back at you :)

Geoff





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise
Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room
http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...fo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.p...st=snort-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0