Fwd: ucdDiskIOMIB

This is a discussion on Fwd: ucdDiskIOMIB within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; > > snmpwalk -v 1 -c community localhost nsModuleName | grep diskio > > > > nsModuleName."".12.1....


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > SNMP Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2008
Mariusz Iwański
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fwd: ucdDiskIOMIB

> > snmpwalk -v 1 -c community localhost nsModuleName | grep diskio
> >
> > nsModuleName."".12.1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.13.15.1.1.1.12 7 = STRING: diskio

> <etc>
>
> So the diskIO module is certainly registered....
>
> > --snmpgetnext -v 1 -c community localhost ucdExperimental
> > UCD-DLMOD-MIB::dlmodNextIndex.0 = INTEGER: 1

>
> and the ucdExperimental subtree is visible...
>
> > --snmpgetnext -v 1 -c community localhost UCD-DISKIO-MIB::diskIOTable
> > UCD-SNMP-MIB::logMatchMaxEntries.0 = INTEGER: 50

>
> but there's nothing in the diskIO MIB section.
>
> Unfortunately, there isn't any debugging in the diskIO MIB code,
> so you're probably going to have to fiddle with the code and re-compile.
>
>
> One final thing to check first - what does
> cat /proc/diskstats
> report?
> Or failing that
> cat /proc/partitions
> ?
>


-- cat /proc/diskstats
there is no such file in my /proc/ directory

-- cat /proc/partitions , returns:

major minor #blocks name

22 0 78125000 hdc
22 1 2931831 hdc1
22 2 11719417 hdc2
22 3 1461915 hdc3
22 4 62010900 hdc4
22 64 78125000 hdd
22 65 2931831 hdd1
22 66 11719417 hdd2
22 67 1461915 hdd3
22 68 62010900 hdd4

Is this should look like this ??? I think that in /proc/partitions
should be more informations .... there is no statistics here. is
diskio using this file ??? Could that be the problem ???

I would like to verify this before uptading any code in diskio.c

>
> If either of those look sensible, then try looking for the routine 'getstats'
> (around like 700 of the file ucd-snmp/diskio.c), and comment out the
> first three or four lines - referring to 'now' and 'cache_time'.
> The recompile, reinstall, and rerun. Does that make any difference?
>
> It might also be worth adding a debug statement so that you can tell
> whether the 'getstats routine is being called at all.
>
> Dave
>


I'm sorry Dave ... I accidentally sent this mail to your private adres
.... not on list adres ... sory

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0