This is a discussion on RE: General security usage question within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; > From: net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On > ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
> From: net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:net-snmp-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On > Behalf Of Davin > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:59 AM > I'd > stick with > 2c unless you have a real reason to use 1, and I don't belief this > qualifies. I don't know why you'd say this. Almost anything which supports SNMP supports SNMPv1, and many don't support anything else. SNMPv2c, on the other hand, is a well supported myth. For read-only SNMP, a v1 community named "public" is the de facto standard. You should not support community based writing unless the customer demands it, as it is insecure. > It is worth mentioning that USM and VACM, which are only available in > v3, In net-snmp, VACM works on communities as well as users. HTH, Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216...et/marketplace _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|