RE: Enterprise trapquestion/send_v2trap API call

This is a discussion on RE: Enterprise trapquestion/send_v2trap API call within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Thanks for this suggestion, Dave! I ran smilint against my MIB and - oops! - there were a bunch of v1/v2 ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > SNMP Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2008
McGowen, Wendy
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Enterprise trapquestion/send_v2trap API call


Thanks for this suggestion, Dave! I ran smilint against my MIB and -
oops! - there were a bunch of v1/v2 errors. I've cleaned the MIB up, and
will post it later for review. I have one last section to add, our own
network support - TPTB don't want full SNMP support in the product, and
they haven't decided if leaving MIB-II turned on shows too much
information. And even if we leave in MIB-II, they want me to add the
same data to our MIB that our management GUI shows for network
subsystem. (We're still discussing the whole MIB-II thing . . .)

Thanks again for all your help!

~ Wendy

-----Original Message-----
From: dave.shield@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shield@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 9:05 AM
To: McGowen, Wendy
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Enterprise trapquestion/send_v2trap API call

On 04/01/2008, McGowen, Wendy <wendym@pivot3.com> wrote:
> Our MIB's are still in definition, and since I'm very new
> to this side of SNMP, any advice on MIB syntax is greatly appreciated!


The first thing to do would be to run them through 'smilint' (or
similar)
to validate the syntax. Our MIB parsing tools are fairly easy-going,
and will accept not-quite-valid MIBs.
smilint is extremely picky, and will report on all sorts of errors
and
inconsistencies. Best to get these dealt with before you go live.

Once your MIBs pass this sort of check, you might want to consider
posting them here (assuming they're not commercially sensitive!),
so we can comment on any design decisions that you might come
to regret later.
It's difficult to make sensible comments about MIB fragments,
taken in isolation. It's much easier when you've got the whole
thing to look at, and can get a better feel for the overall structure.

Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0