This is a discussion on Re: possible bug in getnext implementation within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <Rotemt@waves.com> wrote: > I'm trying to use snmpset to ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <Rotemt@waves.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to use snmpset to set values in table. > I use snmpset ... MyMIB::MyVal.1 = newVal > For now this does not work. > Is this the correct way to do it? If you are using string-valued indexes, then no - this won't work. You must use the same style indexes are returned from walking the table. i.e. something like snmpset .... MyMIB::myVal.\"Station1\" = newVal [Note that MIB object names *must* start with a lower case letter] Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users |