RE: possible bug in getnext implementation

it's indexed by string value.
I use a name as index

Rotem

-----Original Message-----
From: dave.shield@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shield@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:15 PM
To: Rotem Tzuk
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: possible bug in getnext implementation

On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <Rotemt@waves.com> wrote:
> Calling snmpgetnext -v2c - c public localhost MyMIB::MyOID.1 to get
> index no. 1 works fine.
> It works fine for indexes up to 8.
> Trying snmpgetnext -v2c - c public localhost MyMIB::MyOID.9 resulted
> in skipping to the next column.

How is your table indexed?
By a string, or an integer value?


Dave


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users