Re: possible bug in getnext implementation
This is a discussion on Re: possible bug in getnext implementation within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <Rotemt@waves.com> wrote: > Calling snmpgetnext -v2c - c public localhost MyMIB::...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
12-11-2007
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possible bug in getnext implementation
On 11/12/2007, Rotem Tzuk <Rotemt@waves.com> wrote:
> Calling snmpgetnext -v2c - c public localhost MyMIB::MyOID.1 to get index > no. 1 works fine. > It works fine for indexes up to 8. > Trying snmpgetnext -v2c - c public localhost MyMIB::MyOID.9 resulted in > skipping to the next column. How is your table indexed? By a string, or an integer value? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users 
|
Linear Mode
