Re: Semaphore / Synchronizing write operations

Just one final question (I hope :-) )

To make a SET operation to a table, i would use the command : snmpset -v
2c -c public localhost MyLeaf i 1

When using a spinlock aproach, should I do :

snmpset -v 2c -c public localhost SpinLockObject i 0 MyLeaf i 1

???

Thank you very much for all your help.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Shield" <D.T.Shield@liverpool.ac.uk>
To: "vsaavedra" <vsaavedra@maisis.pt>
Cc: <net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Semaphore / Synchronizing write operations


> On 23/10/2007, vsaavedra <vsaavedra@maisis.pt> wrote:
> > Sorry, I didn't specify the netsnmp version.
> > Due to hardware restraints, I'm using version 5.1.4.
>
> Fair enough.
> The setSerialNo.c module was re-written just over three
> years ago, to make use of the spinlock helper (and to
> implement the object properly - i.e. as a scalar object,
> not simply an instance)
>
> That implementation was first released in version 5.2
> of the agent (November 2004)
>
>
> > Is netsnmp_register_watched_spinlock available in 5.1.4 Version ??
>
> Yes.
> Though it wasn't actually listed in the 'watcher.h' header file until 5.2.
> So you might have to declare the API call in your module code file.
> But the routine *is* present in the helper library.
>
> Dave


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users