RE: Looking for clarification regarding users for v3 traps

This is a discussion on RE: Looking for clarification regarding users for v3 traps within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Hmm... Yes I forgot about the -A -X options and that, along with the -e, allows me to configure the ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > SNMP Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007
Miller, Jeff
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Looking for clarification regarding users for v3 traps

Hmm... Yes I forgot about the -A -X options and that, along with the -e,
allows me to configure the remote security name and parameters but now
other issues are more observant.

1. The initial concern about a security name collision in the snmpd usm
table is real. This means I need different security names for the local
snmpd and the remote trapd. I imagine the only solution to this would
require that an additional target usm table would need to be somehow
added into the snmpd code. Opinions?

2. I observed that when configuring trapsess with -A and -X that the
configuration does not persist. There is no persistence for the target
address or for the security parameters associated with the target
address.

3. If I use createUser and specify the engineID along with other
parameters associated with the remote trapd, the local snmpd seems to
want to use its engineID to look up the security name and this fails
because the security name has the remote engineID.

Jeff



-----Original Message-----
From: dave.shield@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shield@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 10:15 AM
To: Miller, Jeff (eng)
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Looking for clarification regarding users for v3 traps

On 07/05/07, Miller, Jeff (eng) <Jeff.Miller@adc.com> wrote:
> In particular, is there a security name collision between the local
> snmpd and the remote snmptrapd?


Probably, yes.
Have you seen the tutorial page
" TRAPs vs INFORMs for SNMPv3"

(http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/wiki...nmptrap_SNMPv3)
?

This explains something of the issues relating to SNMPv3 engineID's as
they relate to notifications (traps and informs).


> I have now established the security name "jeff" for informs but I see
> no means to associate authentication and security passwords with the
> security name "jeff" unless I also do a createUser for "jeff" in the
> snmpd.conf file on the local host as well as in the snmptrapd.conf

file on the remote host.

The "trapsess" directive can accept the -A and -X flags, to specify the
appropriate passwords. (Though obviously there are security
considerations
to doing this!)

Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0