This is a discussion on Re: snmptrap performance within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; --===============1190604354== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-278769828-1174373459=:95928" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --0-278769828-1174373459=:95928 ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
--===============1190604354==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-278769828-1174373459=:95928" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --0-278769828-1174373459=:95928 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thanks for the reply. Regarding the "snmptrap" (not snmptrapd, right?) startup time, should we consider this a bug? Or will it be improved in next versions? I also tried it in net-snmp version 5.1.2 and same behavior was noticed. Please note that I am only using SNMPv1. I will try to create a sample program that will just send a SNMP trap. Hopefully, it is already in the tutorial. I am just a novice net-snmp coder so if anyone have any helpful link regarding this, feel free to post it. Thanks! Regards, Alfred Wes Hardaker <hardaker@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >>>>> "A" == Alfred writes: A> I tested net-snmp (5.4 + snmptrap patch) in a x86 machine (Dell A> GX240) and an embedded device (mips architecture, 233 MHz CPU, 64MB A> RAM). I noticed the delay (around 3 secs) in the embedded device A> when I send traps (using snmptrap). Is this normal? Are there any A> methods on how to improve the performance? (i.e. change configure A> options) I'd suggest using a longer running application for sending traps. I would bet if you implemented a program that just sent traps and stayed running that it would be faster. I'm betting that the startup time of snmptrap is what is killing you here. Maybe because you're using SNMPv3 users? If so, changing from passwords on the command line prompt to localized keys would greatly speed things up. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=...057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users --------------------------------- TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. --0-278769828-1174373459=:95928 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thanks for the reply. <br><br>Regarding the "snmptrap" (not snmptrapd, right?) startup time, should we consider this a bug? Or will it be improved in next versions? I also tried it in net-snmp version 5.1.2 and same behavior was noticed.<br><br>Please note that I am only using SNMPv1. I will try to create a sample program that will just send a SNMP trap. Hopefully, it is already in the tutorial. I am just a novice net-snmp coder so if anyone have any helpful link regarding this, feel free to post it. Thanks!<br><br>Regards,<br>Alfred<br><br><b><i>Wes Hardaker <hardaker@users.sourceforge.net></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> >>>>> "A" == Alfred <rinoa012000@yahoo.com> writes:<br><br>A> I tested net-snmp (5.4 + snmptrap patch) in a x86 machine (Dell<br>A> GX240) and an embedded device (mips architecture, 233 MHz CPU, 64MB<br>A> RAM). I noticed the delay (around 3 secs) in the embedded device<br>A> when I send traps (using snmptrap). Is this normal? Are there any<br>A> methods on how to improve the performance? (i.e. change configure<br>A> options)<br><br>I'd suggest using a longer running application for sending traps. I<br>would bet if you implemented a program that just sent traps and stayed<br>running that it would be faster. I'm betting that the startup time of<br>snmptrap is what is killing you here. Maybe because you're using<br>SNMPv3 users? If so, changing from passwords on the command line<br>prompt to localized keys would greatly speed things up.<br>-- <br>Wes Hardaker<br>Sparta, Inc.<br><br>-------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?<br>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.<br>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo<br>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat= 121642<br>________________________________________ _______<br>Net-snmp-users mailing list<br>Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net<br>Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:<br>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users<br><br></rinoa012000@yahoo.com></blockquote><br><p> <hr size=1>TV dinner still cooling?<br><a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49979/*http://tv.yahoo.com/">Check out "Tonight's Picks"</a> on Yahoo! TV. --0-278769828-1174373459=:95928-- --===============1190604354== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?p...rge&CID=DEVDEV --===============1190604354== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users --===============1190604354==-- |