Re: Can We place Traps as part of Tables

permalink · #1 (**permalink**) 10-13-2006

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--===============0326177305==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0233_01C6EEF6.D82C8680"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0233_01C6EEF6.D82C8680
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Mr Dave

Mistakenly I sent with out checking "CC" and I will take care that issue =
from now

My system is having 3 xDSL Interfaces, when ever an Alarm is genetrated
during the working of the xDSL Interface I should notify the manager =
with a
trap message that an alarm had occured

These are the alarms which I need to monitor "Local Pair 1", "Local Pair =
2",
"Remote Pair 1" & "Remote Pair 2"

as I said I am having 3 xDSL Interfaces the above said 4 Alarms are
applicable to all the 3 Interfaces

So, My intention was rather than creating 4*3 Traps I tought to create =
table
and keep Traps as seperate Part

so this was the MIB's which I have created

-- xDSL Traps Table

xdsltrapTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF XDSLEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A table of E1 switch port configuration information."
::=3D { xDSL 2 }

xdslEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX XDSLEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A table entry containing "
INDEX { interface1,interface2,interface3 }
::=3D { xdsltrapTable 1 }

XDSLEntry ::=3D
SEQUENCE {
InterfaceNo INTEGER,
SystemType INTEGER,
LocalPair1 INTEGER,
LocalPair2 INTEGER,
RemotePair1 INTEGER,
RemotePair2 INTEGER
}

TableCardNo OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER (1..3)
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
" "
::=3D { xdslaEntry 1 }

SystemType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
" "
::=3D { xdslaEntry 2 }

LocalPair1 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
" "
::=3D { xdslaEntry 3 }

LocalPair2 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
" "
::=3D { xdslaEntry 4 }

RemotePair1 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
" "
::=3D { xdslaEntry 5 }

RemotePair2 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
" "
::=3D { xdslaEntry 6 }

when I started the code for this I got the confusion what OID i need to
Specify for particular entity

so to get the confirmation I asked you, which I am partially clear about

Now, I suppose that I *cannot* do this way because I cannot define =
Index to
apply to the trap OID. which I came to know from your previous mail

>If you defined the MIB as a single table covering all four interfaces
>(so that the objects are the same in each case), then you would only
>need a single set of 6 traps.

how to I implement the above idea

thanks

santhosh
------=_NextPart_000_0233_01C6EEF6.D82C8680
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Dear Mr=20
Dave Mistakenly I sent with out checking "CC" and I will take =
care that=20
issue from now My system is having 3 xDSL Interfaces, when ever =
an Alarm=20
is genetrated during the working of the xDSL Interface I should =
notify the=20
manager with a trap message that an alarm had occured These =
are the=20
alarms which I need to monitor "Local Pair 1", "Local Pair =
2", "Remote Pair=20
1" & "Remote Pair 2" as I said I am having 3 xDSL Interfaces =
the=20
above said 4 Alarms are applicable to all the 3 Interfaces So, =
My=20
intention was rather than creating 4*3 Traps I tought to create =
table and=20
keep Traps as seperate Part so this was the MIB's which I have=20
created -- xDSL Traps Table xdsltrapTable=20
OBJECT-TYPE         SYNTAX  =
SEQUENCE=20
OF XDSLEntry       & nbsp;=20
MAX-ACCESS     =20
not-accessible          STATUS=20
mandatory       & nbsp;=20
DESCRIPTION      &nbsp ;   &nbs=
p;     =20
"A table of E1 switch port configuration=20
information."      &nb sp;  ::=3D { xDSL =
2=20
} xdslEntry =
OBJECT-TYPE         =20
SYNTAX  XDSLEntry       & nbsp;=20
MAX-ACCESS     =20
not-accessible          STATUS=20
mandatory       & nbsp;=20
DESCRIPTION      &nbsp ;   &nbs=
p;     =20
"A table entry containing =
"       &nbsp ;=20
INDEX   { interface1,interface2,interface3=20
}         ::=3D { xdsltrapTable 1=20
} XDSLEntry ::=3D       &nbsp ; =
SEQUENCE=20
{    InterfaceNo INTEGER,    SystemType=20
INTEGER,    LocalPair1 INTEGER,    LocalPair2=20
INTEGER,    RemotePair1 INTEGER,    =
RemotePair2=20
INTEGER   } TableCardNo OBJECT-TYPE  SYNTAX =
INTEGER=20
(1..3)  ACCESS not-accessible  STATUS=20
mandatory  DESCRIPTION   &nbs p;   &nb=
sp; =20
" "  ::=3D { xdslaEntry 1 } SystemType=20
OBJECT-TYPE         SYNTAX =20
INTEGER       &nb sp; ACCESS=20
not-accessible          STATUS=20
mandatory       & nbsp;=20
DESCRIPTION      &nbsp ;   &nbs=
p;     =20
" "  ::=3D { xdslaEntry 2 } LocalPair1 =
OBJECT-TYPE  SYNTAX=20
INTEGER  ACCESS not-accessible  STATUS=20
mandatory  DESCRIPTION   &nbs p;   &nb=
sp; =20
" "  ::=3D { xdslaEntry 3 } LocalPair2 =
OBJECT-TYPE  SYNTAX=20
INTEGER  ACCESS not-accessible  STATUS=20
mandatory  DESCRIPTION   &nbs p;   &nb=
sp; =20
" "  ::=3D { xdslaEntry 4 } RemotePair1 =
OBJECT-TYPE  SYNTAX=20
INTEGER  ACCESS not-accessible  STATUS=20
mandatory  DESCRIPTION   &nbs p;   &nb=
sp; =20
" "  ::=3D { xdslaEntry 5 } RemotePair2 =
OBJECT-TYPE  SYNTAX=20
INTEGER  ACCESS not-accessible  STATUS=20
mandatory  DESCRIPTION   &nbs p;   &nb=
sp; =20
" "  ::=3D { xdslaEntry 6 } when I started the code =
for this I=20
got the confusion what OID i need to Specify for particular =
entity so=20
to get the confirmation I asked you, which I am partially clear=20
about Now, I suppose  that I *cannot* do this way because I =
cannot=20
define Index to apply to the trap OID. which I came to know from your =

previous mail >If you defined the MIB as a single table =
covering all=20
four interfaces >(so that the objects are the same in each case), =
then you=20
would only >need a single set of 6 traps. how to I =
implement the=20
above =
idea thanks santhosh</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0233_01C6EEF6.D82C8680--

--===============0326177305==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=...057&dat=121642
--===============0326177305==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users

--===============0326177305==--

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode