This is a discussion on RE: trapsess instead of trap2sink within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; OK, it works now. It thought 162 is the default port for traps. Thanks a lot, Eugen -----Original Message----- From: ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
OK, it works now. It thought 162 is the default port for traps.
Thanks a lot, Eugen -----Original Message----- From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:hardaker@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:06 AM To: Eugen Cc: Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: trapsess instead of trap2sink >>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:16:08 -0500, "Eugen" <eugen@blueslice.com> said: eugen> If I'm trying to use trapsess instead as follows eugen> trapsess -v 2c -c my_rwc localhost Can you try: trapsess -v 2c -c my_rwc localhost:162 -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=...486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users |