Re: Net-SNMP 5.2.1.2 Win32 vs. HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad

Winfried Neessen wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
>>That's because this particular object has not been implemented.
>>>From the FAQ:
>>
[...]
>>On a Unix-based system, the usual advice is to monitor the
>>UCD-SNMP-MIB::laTable (for the Unix 1, 5 and 15 minute load
>>averages). I'm not sure whether this works under Windows,
>>but it's worth a look.
>>
>
> Yep you are right, but also this doesn't seem to be implemented
> correctly for the Win32 Net-SNMPd.
>

Nope, the UCD mib does not work correctly (if at all) on Windows.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users