Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib

--EXCITEBOUNDARY_000__562f76d03712c559fac0c39b323096 3c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Dave,



Thanks. I did the repeater(repetition) value experimentation based



on Roberts suggestion. Just want to be sure, but does setting the



non-repeater value to 1 have a similar functional effect to the a



command as the max-repetitions? i.e. Is this something that I cannot



ask an SNMP manager to do as it is non-standard or maybe it does not



provide the expected GetBulk optimization effect?



- John





--- On Thu 05/26, Dave Shield wrote:

From: Dave Shield [mailto: D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk]

To: jntdino@excite.com

Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 10:34:21 +0100

Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib



On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 19:11, jntdino@excite.com wrote:> Also, changing the max-repeater to 1. Is changing these values> to make a bulkwalk work an acceptable practice?Changing the max-repetitions of a GetBulk to 1 is singularlypointless. You might as well use GetNext in the first place.Dave

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

--EXCITEBOUNDARY_000__562f76d03712c559fac0c39b323096 3c
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Dave,

<br><br>

Thanks. I did the repeater(repetition) value experimentation based

<br>

on Roberts suggestion. Just want to be sure, but does setting the

<br>

non-repeater value to 1 have a similar functional effect to the a

<br>

command as the max-repetitions? i.e. Is this something that I cannot

<br>

ask an SNMP manager to do as it is non-standard or maybe it does not

<br>

provide the expected GetBulk optimization effect?

<br><br>

- John

<br><br>

<br>

--- On Thu 05/26, Dave Shield < D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk > wrote:

From: Dave Shield [mailto: D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk]

To: jntdino@excite.com

Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 10:34:21 +0100

Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib

<br><br>

On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 19:11, jntdino@excite.com wrote:<br>> Also, changing the max-repeater to 1. Is changing these values<br>> to make a bulkwalk work an acceptable practice?<br><br>Changing the max-repetitions of a GetBulk to 1 is singularly<br>pointless. You might as well use GetNext in the first place.<br><br><br>Dave<br><br><p><hr><font size=2 face=geneva><b>Join Excite! - <a href=http://www.excite.com target=_blank>http://www.excite.com</a></b><br>The most personalized portal on the Web!</font>

--EXCITEBOUNDARY_000__562f76d03712c559fac0c39b323096 3c--




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users