Re: Memory leak in sub-agents

Hi,

Sorry for mistake i am using
netsnmp_register_table(my_handler, table_info);

instead of
netsnmp_register_table_iterator(my_handler, table_info);

Whenever i enter the Handler i process the request i.e. send the
request to the EMS and get the response.

Whenever getnext or walk on the table is performed the sub-agent
memory keeps on growing. Is there any fix for this problem.

On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 14:46, Dave Shield wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 09:51, Sasikumar Bodathula wrote:
> > I am not populating the data locally(requirement) instead i pass
> > the request to the EMS and the response is passed to the snmpd....
> > .... hence there is no need for get_first and get_next methods.
>
> OK - then you shouldn't be using the iterator helper.
> This helper *does* rely on the get_first/get_next hooks.
>
> If you're handling the indexing yourself, then you'd probably
> be better off using 'netsnmp_register_table' instead.
>
> Dave
>



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users