This is a discussion on Re: Net-SNMP 5.1.2 core dumping within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Hey there, thanks for the response. I can't reproduce the fail right now to get the backtrace and send ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hey there, thanks for the response.
I can't reproduce the fail right now to get the backtrace and send ito to you, cause there's only two machines available and they're currenlty being used for testing, so maybe tomorrow I can do it. Then I'll post it here. About the other question, the traps are being sent with the send_v2trap call. I was thinking maybe issues with memory allocation or local/global variables with the parameters for snmp_varlist_add_variable. Just a guess. If there's some help you could provide with this information that would be great. I'll post the backtrace as soon as I can get it anyway. Thanks in advance. Fabio On 4/13/05, Robert Story <rstory@freesnmp.com> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:14:13 -0300 Fabio wrote: > FM> We're currently using Net-SNMP 5.1.2 in an embedded system, and snmpd > FM> is showing strange behaviour in the following situation: if the > FM> sub-agent sends snmpd a trap to be handled while it's processing > FM> another request, a "get" for instance, snmpd segfaults. >=20 > If you are having problems with an application crashing, it is very helpf= ul > to have a backtrace (aka stack trace) at the point of the crash. If you c= an > run the application with GDB and reproduce the problem, the 'backtrace' > command should print this information for you. >=20 > FM> I'd like to know if someone has experienced the same difficulties wit= h > FM> this version, and if the newest release version fixes this. We > FM> wouldn't like to go through all the trouble of cross-compiling and > FM> replacing all systems with another version unless we know it's going > FM> to solve our problem. >=20 > You could always just try one system to see if it has been fixed for 5.2.= 1. But > I'd guess it probably hasn't. >=20 > How are you sending the traps? Using the high level APIs (eg send_easy_tr= ap), > or building PDUs yourself and sending them? >=20 > If your snmpd configure to send traps or informs? >=20 > -- > NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted > unless they are requests for paid consulting services. >=20 > Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie > Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> > Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/f...=3Dnet-snmp-u= sers> >=20 > You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|