Re: MIB, sub-agent design questions from beginner

This is a discussion on Re: MIB, sub-agent design questions from beginner within the SNMP Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:46:45 -0800 (PST) Steve wrote: SSL> MYAPP basically SSL> consists of ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > SNMP Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2005
Robert Story
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: MIB, sub-agent design questions from beginner

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:46:45 -0800 (PST) Steve wrote:
SSL> MYAPP basically
SSL> consists of various/different applications all running
SSL> on the same node. All the parameters to be monitored
SSL> for all these applications (application A, application
SSL> B, and so on) will be the same. There will be multiple
SSL> instances of the same application: for example,
SSL> application A instance #1 , application A instance #2,
SSL> application B instance # 1, application B instance #2
SSL> and so on. The number of instances per application is
SSL> not fixed and configurable for each run of MYAPP.
SSL>
SSL> To monitor MYAPP, I plan to use some of the parameters
SSL> (for example, applOperStatus) from
SSL> NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB.txt (rfc 2788) and some (for
SSL> example, mtaStoredVolume) from MTA-MIB.txt (rfc 2789).
SSL>
SSL> (1) MIB question:
SSL> It looks like I must define a new MIB that will
SSL> contain the desired parameters from both the above
SSL> standard MIBs?

If you don't want to implement the tables themselves, then you can copy and
rename the object definitions you like in your own mib.

SSL> (2) This question is related to table design :
SSL> applTable (from NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB.txt). I need to
SSL> monitor all instances (for example , application A
SSL> instance#1, application A instance#2 and so on). Does
SSL> that mean that the table would look something like:
SSL>
SSL> first row for application A instance #1
SSL> second row for application A instance #2
SSL> third row for application B instance #1
SSL> fourth row for application B instance # 2
SSL> ......
SSL> and so on ?

The applTable does not specify any order constraints, so you could order them
however you want, as long as they don't re-number during run-time.

SSL> Would there be problems in populationg the table since
SSL> the number of instances per application type is not
SSL> fixed?

Nope.

--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.

Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...net-snmp-users
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0