RFV: r16973

This is a discussion on RFV: r16973 within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; I, with no thought on release state, committed r16937 to all branches 05-28 without any +3. The change is ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > SNMP Coders

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008
Magnus Fromreide
 
Posts: n/a
Default RFV: r16973

I, with no thought on release state, committed r16937 to all branches
05-28 without any +3.

The change is a bug fix, but it is questionable if it is release
critical.

If a scalar_helper(name, 1, 10) is called with GETNEXT(name.0) then it
will respond with REPLY(name.0.0, value) instead of the correct
REPLY(name.1.0, value).

The patch adds a check for the lower bound of the range in addition to
the old check for the upper bound.

Should it stay applied?

+1

/MF


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2008
Thomas Anders
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: RFV: r16973

Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> The patch adds a check for the lower bound of the range in addition to
> the old check for the upper bound.
>
> Should it stay applied?


Not worth backing out! :-)

+1


+Thomas

--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008
Wes Hardaker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: RFV: r16973

>>>>> On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:12:48 +0200, Magnus Fromreide <magfr@lysator.liu.se> said:

MF> Should it stay applied?

Yep! +1
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders

Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0