This is a discussion on Changes in our .spec file within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Hi, during discussion with Thomas Anders about the .spec file in SVN we found out few possible improvements, which need ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hi,
during discussion with Thomas Anders about the .spec file in SVN we found out few possible improvements, which need more discussion on this list. Fedora splits Net-SNMP to many subpackages - net-snmp (the server), net-snmp-utils (the clients), net-snmp-libs, net-snmp-perl, net-snmp-devel and net-snmp-gui (for tkmib). The rpms we distribute at SF.net download page are split differently and do not force removal of the Fedora packages, i.e. Fedora's net-snmp-utils won't get removed when user installs our net-snmp.rpm. The easy solution is to add Conflicts: and Provides: statements to our .spec to clearly replace Fedora packages. Question is, whether we want such Fedora-only dependencies in the .spec. And another question is what about other distros - quick look at Mandriva shows, that they have completely different packaging of Net-SNMP. Second issue is that most distributions provide sample configuration file in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf. Why don't we distribute one? Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757...un.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|