Re: Issues with net-snmp 5.4.1 and 5.3.2(Linking and a bug seen again)

This is a discussion on Re: Issues with net-snmp 5.4.1 and 5.3.2(Linking and a bug seen again) within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; --===============1713046918== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16772_8037256.1207645071033" ------=_Part_16772_8037256.1207645071033 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > SNMP Coders

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008
anand
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with net-snmp 5.4.1 and 5.3.2(Linking and a bug seen again)

--===============1713046918==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_16772_8037256.1207645071033"

------=_Part_16772_8037256.1207645071033
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Dave
What i meant by both patches is that I applied them one by one.
Both have some changes to be made for 5.3.1 code which I made and Applied
them.
After Patching..I did a make uninstall and recompiled the code again after
running ./configure.
However the error still persists.The container error on SIGHUP that is.

Then I checked out the 5.2.4 tarball which seems to support Localized Keys.
It is not breaking on SIGHUP also.I tested the build on an x86 machine also.
I reckon this build should be fine for me.

However I faced another issue while compilation.I do not see any .so files
when I compiled and linked them inside .libs directory.
Are there any changes I should make on the build for the so files to
appear.Kindly let me know.

As far as the earlier problem is concerned these are the details Step by
Step:

1.First the build tried was 5.3.2.
Here I applied the net-snmp-5.3-shared-ip-4.patch and it was successfully
applied.
However when I did a SIGHUP i found the problem of subcontainer still
exists.

2.Then I tried the alternate solution of container-atomic-insert.patch and
when I applied the same it also succesfully applied.
However when I tried starting SNMP daemon it threw me an error in the
/var/log/snmpd.log saying undeclared silent flag.There is mention of the
same in the Patch thread also which says this needs to be provided by
another patch.

3.Then I tried both of these things(one-by-one) on 5.3.1.
This succeeded without any errors(However I had to change the code manually
due to some line locations being here and there in the patches.
Then on run time I Still found the container Errors on SIGHUP.

I did a make uninstall and repeated configure and make Steps in all the
combinations.

4.Then i tried doing the same steps with 5.2.4.Everything is working fine
here except that I dont see the Sos being created.

*Architechture:
2.6.10-1.771_FC2 #1 Mon Mar 28 00:50:14 EST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux*

Thanks for all the help Dave/Thomas..i will be trying out with the nightly
Tar Balls also.

Thanks again

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Dave Shield <D.T.Shield@liverpool.ac.uk>
wrote:

> On 08/04/2008, anand <anand.huawei@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have applied the container-atomic-insert.patch as well as
> > net-snmp-5.3-shared-ip-4.patch on the release Net-SNMP 5.3.1.

>
> I'm not sure whether it's sensible to apply *both* patches.
> According to the comments in that tracker item, the container
> patch is meant as an *alternative* to the original shared-ip patch.
> I have no idea whether the two work together cleanly or not.
>
>
> I'm inclined to second Thomas' suggestion. Forget about patching
> the code yourself. Grab a copy of the net-snmp-svn-V5-3-patches....
> tarball from http://www.net-snmp.org/nightly/tarballs/
> At least that way we know you're working with a clean code base.
>
> Remove any existing Net-SNMP installations,
> configure, compile and install this, and then try your tests again.
> If they still don't work, please tell us *exactly* what requests you
> attempted, how the agent was configured, what you expected to
> see and what actually happened.
> Looking back through your earlier queries, they tend to be a
> bit light on detail, which makes it difficult for us to assist you.
>
> Dave
>


------=_Part_16772_8037256.1207645071033
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Dave<br>What i meant by both patches is that I applied them one by one.<br>Both have some changes to be made for 5.3.1 code which I made and Applied them.<br>After Patching..I did a make uninstall and recompiled the code again after running ./configure.<br>
However the error still persists.The container error on SIGHUP that is.<br><br>Then I checked out the 5.2.4 tarball which seems to support Localized Keys.<br>It is not breaking on SIGHUP also.I tested the build on an x86 machine also.<br>
I reckon this build should be fine for me.<br><br>However I faced another issue while compilation.I do not see any .so files when I compiled and linked them inside .libs directory.<br>Are there any changes I should make on the build for the so files to appear.Kindly let me know.<br>
<br>As far as the earlier problem is concerned these are the details Step by Step:<br><br>1.First the build tried was <a href="http://5.3.2.">5.3.2.</a><br>Here I applied the net-snmp-5.3-shared-ip-4.patch and it was successfully applied.<br>
However when I did a SIGHUP i found the problem of subcontainer still exists.<br><br>2.Then I tried the alternate solution of container-atomic-insert.patch and when I applied the same it also succesfully applied.<br>However when I tried starting SNMP daemon it threw me an error in the /var/log/snmpd.log saying undeclared silent flag.There is&nbsp; mention of the same in the Patch thread also which says this needs to be provided by another patch.<br>
<br>3.Then I tried both of these things(one-by-one) on <a href="http://5.3.1.">5.3.1.</a><br>This succeeded without any errors(However I had to change the code manually due to some line locations being here and there in the patches.<br>
Then on run time I Still found the container Errors on SIGHUP.<br><br>I did a make uninstall and repeated configure and make Steps in all the combinations.<br><br>4.Then i tried doing the same steps with 5.2.4.Everything is working fine here except that I dont see the Sos being created.<br>
<br><b>Architechture:<br>2.6.10-1.771_FC2 #1 Mon Mar 28 00:50:14 EST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux</b><br><br>Thanks for all the help Dave/Thomas..i will be trying out with&nbsp; the nightly Tar Balls also.<br><br>Thanks again<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Dave Shield &lt;<a href="mailto:D.T.Shield@liverpool.ac.uk">D.T.Shiel d@liverpool.ac.uk</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On 08/04/2008, anand &lt;<a href="mailto:anand.huawei@gmail.com">anand.huawei@ gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; &nbsp;I have applied the container-atomic-insert.patch as well as<br>
&gt; net-snmp-5.3-shared-ip-4.patch on the release Net-SNMP <a href="http://5.3.1." target="_blank">5.3.1.</a><br>
<br>
</div>I'm not sure whether it's sensible to apply *both* patches.<br>
According to the comments in that tracker item, the container<br>
patch is meant as an *alternative* to the original shared-ip patch.<br>
I have no idea whether the two work together cleanly or not.<br>
<br>
<br>
I'm inclined to second Thomas' suggestion. &nbsp; Forget about patching<br>
the code yourself. &nbsp; Grab a copy of the net-snmp-svn-V5-3-patches....<br>
tarball from <a href="http://www.net-snmp.org/nightly/tarballs/" target="_blank">http://www.net-snmp.org/nightly/tarballs/</a><br>
&nbsp; At least that way we know you're working with a clean code base.<br>
<br>
Remove any existing Net-SNMP installations,<br>
configure, compile and install this, and then try your tests again.<br>
If they still don't work, please tell us *exactly* what requests you<br>
attempted, how the agent was configured, what you expected to<br>
see and what actually happened.<br>
&nbsp; Looking back through your earlier queries, they tend to be a<br>
bit light on detail, which makes it difficult for us to assist you.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Dave<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_16772_8037256.1207645071033--


--===============1713046918==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m.,
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757...un.com/javaone
--===============1713046918==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders

--===============1713046918==--

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0