Re: Planned improvements to the netsnmp python module?

>>>>> "NS" == Nathan Schrenk <nathan@schrenk.org> writes:

NS> Is there any work planned to fix either of these problems? If not,
NS> if I were to modify the library to throw exceptions from the
NS> snmpget, snmpwalk, etc, functions when they encountered errors and
NS> submit a patch, would the NET-SNMP developers have any objection in
NS> principle to that type of change?

We'd have to review the changes, of course, but improvements to the
module would be highly appreciated. The original work was based on work
done for "Science Logic" as they needed a faster SNMP implementation so
a C binding made since (and apparently did have a big speed
improvement). But, as far as I know, no one is actively working on
improving the binding right now so someone actively working on it would
certainly be a good thing. Submit any patches you make to:

http://www.net-snmp.org/patches/

--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders